NSNS BusinessSTRATEGY
Language
Language: English
All practices

Operating Model and Efficiency

End-to-end operating model redesign: front-office processes (sales, service, customer care), middle office (planning, supply chain, risk) and back office (finance, procurement, HR, IT) to reduce cost, error and cycle time.

Diagrama de procesos y cadena de valor en pizarrón

The challenge

Disconnected processes between the commercial front and administrative support, manual handoffs and lack of traceability that keep leadership from making decisions with timely information.

Our approach

  • End-to-end mapping of the operating model: front, middle and back office
  • Redesign of key value chains (Lead to Cash, Order to Delivery, Plan to Produce, Source to Pay, Record to Report, Hire to Retire, Service to Resolution)
  • Definition of roles, responsibilities, governance and organizational structure
  • Technology enablement, automation and adoption plan

Deliverables

  • Documented target operating model (front, middle and back office)
  • Process redesign with controls, SLAs and interfaces between areas
  • Efficiency case with quantified savings
  • Transition and change-management plan
NS Methodology · FL·NS

Clean Flow

Friction-free processes, from the first interaction to the last ledger entry.

Every manual handoff between the front and support functions is a recurring cost and a control risk: it is eliminated in the design, not in rework.

F1

End-to-end X-ray

We map the complete value chains — commercial, service, supply chain and administrative support — measuring cycle time, rework, exceptions and cost per transaction.

  • End-to-end mapping with system data
  • Cost per transaction and FTE
  • Map of handoffs, exceptions and rework
F2

Target process design

We redesign each process — from customer contact to accounting close — with embedded controls, clear exception rules and non-duplicated responsibilities between front and back office.

  • Target process with controls
  • RACI matrix and segregation of duties
  • Service agreements between areas
F3

Automation and data

We define what gets automated, what gets standardized, and what requires clean master data so information flows from point of sale to reporting without manual reconciliations.

  • Automation roadmap
  • Master-data governance
  • Target functional architecture
F4

Transition and adoption

We support the migration with a change plan, training and stability measurement before releasing the process.

  • Transition plan by wave
  • Change-management program
  • SLA and performance dashboard

FL·NS methodology path

Sequence of phases, with the analytical focus of each one and the decision point that closes it.

F1
End-to-end X-ray
End-to-end mapping with system data · Cost per transaction and FTE · Map of handoffs, exceptions and rework
F2
Target process design
Target process with controls · RACI matrix and segregation of duties · Service agreements between areas
F3
Automation and data
Automation roadmap · Master-data governance · Target functional architecture
F4
Transition and adoption
Transition plan by wave · Change-management program · SLA and performance dashboard

Fig. 1 · Phase flow

Cycle time by end-to-end process

The redesign is measured in cycle days and manual touches removed. The target for each value chain — front, middle and back office — is set against the NS reference base percentiles.

Lead to Cash (front office)38% cycle timePlan to Deliver (middle office)29% cycle timeSource to Pay / Record to Report (back office)52% cycle timeLight bar: client baseline · Solid bar: top-quartile sector target (NS base percentiles)

Fig. 3 · Client baseline vs. top sector quartile

Reference ranges behind the framework

Index values from the NS engagement base that we use to calibrate hypotheses and targets before measuring with the client's own data.

3.64%

of revenue is the average IT budget across industries (≈8% banking, <2% manufacturing and construction)

NS Base · Operating Model
55 / 26 / 19

typical split of the technology portfolio between running the business, growing it, and transforming it

NS Base · Operating Model
DSO / close

O2C, P2P, and R2R processes are compared against the 25th/50th/75th percentiles of the NS reference base

NS Base · Operating Model

Fig. 4 · NS reference ranges

Deliverables map

Each deliverable is anchored to the phase where it is produced and validated with the client team.

F1
Documented target operating model (front, middle and back office)
F2
Process redesign with controls, SLAs and interfaces between areas
F3
Efficiency case with quantified savings
F4
Transition and change-management plan

Fig. 2 · Deliverables by phase

The figures use reference ranges and index values from the NS method, calibrated with our project base and market tracking. Each project's results are reported with the client's actual figures.

-90% errors and manual reconciliations
-25% cycle time in key processes
-12% technology cost
JM·SN

Co-led by both partners

José Manuel Noriega and Santiago Noriega

A two-hemisphere mandate: the economics of the decision and the organization's ability to deliver it.

See partner profiles
AI as an accelerator

AI as an accelerator in this practice

We use process mining and AI to see the real process — not the documented one — across Lead to Cash, Source to Pay and Hire to Retire.

  • Process mining over ERP and HCM logs to surface rework, bottlenecks and hidden variants
  • Automated classification of activities by value added and automation potential
  • Design of automations and copilots for repetitive back and middle office tasks
  • Cost to serve calculated per process with AI-assisted allocation models

We work with data governance, confidentiality controls and human validation on every deliverable: AI accelerates the analysis, it never replaces the decision.

Impact cases

-90%

manual errors and reconciliations

Redesign of Record to Report, Order to Cash and Procure to Pay, optimizing the accounting close to four days.

Catalog-sales retailer · Mexico

-$3M USD

annual costs

Production cost optimization through S&OP process redesign, delivered to the Finance Department.

Hygiene products company · Peru

New

financial management model

Redesign of the Finance operating model to increase efficiency and strengthen control mechanisms.

Private hospital · Mexico

-12%

technology costs

Redesign of the group-wide IT operating model.

Freight transportation group · Mexico

-18%

structure cost

End-to-end operating model redesign post-spin-off: front, middle and back office processes, governance, roles and separation of shared services from the parent company.

Global managed IT infrastructure services provider (spin-off from a technology corporation) · Mexico and Latin America

Let's talk about your specific case

A first conversation is enough to size the opportunity.